<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RSC Blog &#187; quantum dots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/tag/quantum-dots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc</link>
	<description>News and comment on science policy, education and media from the Royal Society of Chemistry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not quite chemical free, but 100% highly commended</title>
		<link>http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/2009/01/06/nevillereed/not-quite-chemical-free-but-100-highly-commended/</link>
		<comments>http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/2009/01/06/nevillereed/not-quite-chemical-free-but-100-highly-commended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neville Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RSC in the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100% chemical free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum dots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, even an offer of £1 million hasn&#8217;t brought the next Nobel Prize winner out of the woodwork to present me with a 100% chemical free material. In light of some exceptional dedication and tenacity, however, I have awarded a &#8220;Highly Commended&#8221; prize. Stephen George, from Australia, sent us by FedEx these sample vials, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As expected, even <a href="http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/2008/11/06/nevillereed/100-chemical-free-living/" target="_blank">an offer of £1 million</a> hasn&#8217;t brought the next Nobel Prize winner out of the woodwork to present me with a 100% chemical free material. In light of some exceptional dedication and tenacity, however, I have awarded a &#8220;Highly Commended&#8221; prize.</p>
<p>Stephen George, from Australia, sent us by FedEx these sample vials, containing semiconductor nanocrystals in toluene solution:</p>
<div id="attachment_232" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-232" title="Highly commended entry for 100% chemical free" src="http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chemfreehighcomm-300.jpg" alt="CdSe/ZnS Core Shell quantum dots in toluene - not exactly 100% chemical free but the best we've had yet" width="300" height="224" /><p class="wp-caption-text">CdSe/ZnS Core Shell nanocrystal quantum dots in toluene - not exactly 100% chemical free but the best we&#39;ve had yet!</p></div>
<p>Mr George&#8217;s claim is based on the exciton confinement properties of such nanocrystals &#8211; they create a so-called  &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dots" target="_blank">quantum dot</a>&#8221; where electrons are restricted in three dimensions.</p>
<p>The claim was that an &#8220;electron is not a chemical and that the solution/matrix is just a container.&#8221; Like other less well thought out claims we&#8217;ve heard, the necessity of the container rules this entry out from winning the prize. Mr George&#8217;s contention that a material&#8217;s properties are defined by its electrons only was also in dispute.</p>
<p>Having said all that, Mr George set about this challenge in a scientific manner, not regurgitating the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2008/aug/06/dodgyscienceintvadverts" target="_blank">same nonsense the advertising companies do</a>, but methodically assessing the best candidate based on his own research. His entry is clearly streets ahead of claims of &#8220;100% chemical free organic olive oil&#8221; that I have received!</p>
<p>The following day I had an invoice from FedEx for the postage. In recognition of Mr George&#8217;s enthusiasm and creativity, although his entry is not eligible for the £1 million, I will reward him by paying the FedEx bill of £42.44. Not a bad second prize, but I won&#8217;t be giving out any more.</p>
<p>Thanks again to Stephen George for his creative entry.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fprospect.rsc.org%2Fblogs%2Frsc%2F2009%2F01%2F06%2Fnevillereed%2Fnot-quite-chemical-free-but-100-highly-commended%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Not+quite+chemical+free%2C+but+100%25+highly+commended';
  addthis_pub    = '';
  addthis_options = 'email, favorites, digg, delicious, stumbleupon, twitter, myspace, reddit, facebook, google, live, more';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/rsc/2009/01/06/nevillereed/not-quite-chemical-free-but-100-highly-commended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

