Mon 23 Apr 2007
Who is the greatest living chemist? A league table, based on what some argue is the fairest measure of research achievement ever devised, may now provide the answer.
Top of the pile is organic chemist E J Corey of Harvard University, who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1990 for his ‘masterly development of organic synthesis’ – the ability to stitch together complex carbon-based molecules.
Harvard scientists also occupy slots two and three, in the form of George Whitesides – a pioneer of materials chemistry and nanotechnology – and Martin Karplus, a theoretical chemist. The leading British chemist indexed so far is placed at number 13 – Alan Fersht of Cambridge University, who studies protein chemistry. The full table is published on Chemistry World’s website.
The chemists were ranked by h-index, a number invented by physicist Jorge Hirsch in 2005 to measure research impact. A scientist’s h-index is the highest number of papers they have published which have each amassed at least that number of citations from other authors: Corey, with an h of 132, has published 132 papers which have each received at least 132 citations, for example.
Henry Schaefer, a chemist at the University of Georgia, US, created the rankings with colleague Amy Peterson, and describes it as a work in progress. Though the top 10 won’t surprise anyone, said Schaefer, some Nobel Prize winners are buried deep down in the table. Nobel-winning organometallic chemist E O Fischer, for example, squeezes in at joint 251st with an h of 60. That may be because the Nobel Prize is awarded for one achievement, while the h-index marks a whole career, suggests Schaefer.
Read the full list here.


April 26th, 2007 at 1:23 am
[…] References [1] Royal Society of Chemistry, Chemistry World News Article, Chemistry World Blog Article [2] Wikipedia Article on h-index; Nature Article on h-index [3] Web Program [4] PDF of Chemistry List (from RSC Website) […]
May 2nd, 2007 at 10:20 am
The Hirsch index is certainly a clever idea, but one has to be aware that it rewards you even for time going by while you do nothing.
I, for example, left research in 2000 with a Hirsch index of 10, and have watched it rising by one unit every year since then. By December 2006 it reached 16, without my doing anything
(see http://www.geocities.com/michaelgrr/papercit.html for citation counts).
Hence it is useful to compare candidates of similar seniority and specialty, e.g. applicants for a professorship. But a global ranking comparing older and younger chemists will necessarily be biased heavily in favour of the older ones. Unless one normalizes the data by dividing it by a measure of time, such as the number of years since first publication.
May 2nd, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Yes, and there are lots of neat mathematical normalisations to be done on the h-index. Dividing it by something like number of years is often referred to as the ‘corrected’ h-index, or sometimes the m-index, while there’s also the g-index, the contemporary h-index, the individual h-index… I found a useful discussion here: http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm#/pop_hindex.htm
And then again, the gradient of your h-index may indicate how fast your research impact is rising; or you could compare your h-index gradient to that of the same career stage in a composite average h-index profile for your chosen research field, to see whether you were ahead of the game. All sorts of fun to be had!
May 14th, 2007 at 11:09 am
biggest flaws, never mentioned: it includes self-citations; it is not normalized to the number of authors per paper. Big sharks that have big groups and sign everything without even reading get even bigger bonuses, with self-citation within the area increasing in an exponential way. H-index takes from the poor to give to the rich.
May 23rd, 2007 at 10:44 am
[…] Thought I’d let you know that the h-index chemistry league table which Chemistry World published last month has now been updated with another 30 or so chemists. […]
July 10th, 2007 at 10:16 am
I couldn’t help but notice the inclusion of Ray U. Lemieux in the H-index list of living chemists. Ray died in 2000.