Guest post by Heather Cassell

Over the course of your life in the lab you can get to learn many different experimental techniques, and for most people this can be both very interesting and very exciting – the intrigue of novelty. But you can also get stuck using just a few techniques over and over, which can be frustrating and reduces the excitement to drudgery. Sometimes repetition is necessary if your experiment doesn’t go so well, if the process needs optimising, or if you have many similar samples to process in the same way. If the repetition is simply due to a large number of samples then perseverance is required to get the results you need. If the quality of your science depends on a little drudgery, then that’s what it takes.

Groundhog in Minneapolis – Image by Marumari at the English language Wikipedia, CC-BY-SA-3.0 or GFDL

But if there are problems with the experiment itself, a good place to start is repeating the experiment without change, to eliminate the possibility that something was set up incorrectly. (more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)